Legal Opinion

Coleman v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1919No. L. A. No. 4915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

In this action, the plaintiff, a purchaser at a sale by the tax collector of Los Angeles County, having been defeated in an action against the owner of the property, seeks to recover from the county the money paid by her to the tax collector as the purchase price thereof. Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff after a general demurrer was sustained to the complaint and she appeals.

The tax sale was conducted under the provisions of section 3897 of the Political Code. This action is based upon subdivision 5 of section 3898 of the Political Code as amended in 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 560),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Moyer v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Smith v. RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Brooks v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Scott v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API