Miller v. County of Kern
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This action was brought under section 3819 of the Political Code, to recover $21,668.92, paid under protest by plaintiff, as surviving partner of Miller & Lux, for state and county taxes on real and personal property of said Miller & Lux for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1896. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff declining to amend, judgment passed for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals. Respondent has filed no brief. There are five separate counts in the complaint. In each protest and each count it is claimed that the whole tax is void upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Westfall v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Brevoort v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Dranga v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Cottle v. SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Weyse v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Pasadena v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Telonis v. StaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- El Tejon Cattle Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.