Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Santamarina

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1982No. L.A. 31435PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal pursuant to section 583, subdivision (b), of the Code of Civil Procedure 1 —the so-called “five-year statute.” We reverse principally because the action was brought to trial within five years after it was filed. We also hold, however, that even if the case had not been brought to trial, the five years had not run when it was dismissed.

I

The complaint for medical malpractice was filed on February 7, 1974. Defendant promptly answered and an at-issue memorandum was filed on May 14, 1974. The first assigned trial date was October 20,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bella Vista Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Kadota v. City & County of San FraciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Vecki v. SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rhinehart v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. River West, Inc. v. NickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API