Legal Opinion
Kadota v. City & County of San Fracisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1958No. Civ. 17941PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal. The complaint in this action was filed on September 11, 1951. By written stipulation the time of trial was extended until May 11, 1957. On May 9, 1957, the parties regularly appeared in court for trial and a jury was impaneled and sworn. On May 10, 1957, which was a Friday, counsel for plaintiff asked the court to continue the case to Monday, May 13, because, as he stated, he was too ill to proceed with the trial. Counsel for plaintiff was granted a continuance until May 13 in the face of a statement by counsel for defendant that if such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Caples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Silcox v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- United States of America Ex Rel. G. Daniel Walker v. Jacob B. Gunn, People of the State of California v. G. Daniel WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Palmer v. AgeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.