Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FAINER, J. *
1. Introduction
Plaintiff Hilliard appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of defendant Robins on the bifurcated issue of punitive damages. Plaintiff also contends that the trial court erred in granting nonsuits as to her fraud claims and in excluding certain evidence. Defendant Robins cross-appeals from the judgment on special verdict for $600,000 general damages in favor of plaintiff and against Robins only, asserting that the case was not brought to trial within the five-year mandatory time limit of Code of Civil…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.