Legal Opinion

Bella Vista Development Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1963No. Civ. 21620PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Petitioners Bella Vista Development Co. and Bruce A. Werlhof seek a writ of prohibition restraining the respondent superior court from taking further proceedings in the hereinafter described civil action now pending therein. The sole question for our determination is whether said action was brought to trial within five years after it was filed and should therefore be dismissed by the court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583. We have concluded that it was not so brought to trial and that the writ should be granted.

The action in question, entitled Ernest N. Kettenhofen and Bernice…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Silcox v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hartman v. SantamarinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Breckenridge v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Diverco Constructors, Inc. v. WilsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Dresser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API