Legal Opinion

Herring v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 27, 1988No. 0720-88PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*284OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault and the punishment was assessed at ten (10) years in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $1,000.00 fine. On direct appeal the conviction was affirmed. Herring v. State, 752 S.W.2d 169 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st], 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review in which he contends that the court of appeals erred in failing to analyze the harm flowing from the inclusion of a charge to the jury at the punishment phase relating to the law of parole pursuant to Article…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Asberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  2. Marin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Stringer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API