Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 7, 1989No. 05-85-01245-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant appeals two convictions for murder. For the murder of Koby Sandov-sky, the jury assessed punishment at thirty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. For the murder of Lesia Kahl, the jury assessed punishment at life in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirmed. Arnold v. State, Nos. 05-85-01245-CR and 05-85-01246-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas, December 4, 1986) (unpublished) (Arnold I). In affirming we held that the parole law instruction mandated by article 37.07, section 4, of the Texas Code of Criminal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. LaPoint v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Herring v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Anthony Wasylina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  3. Anthony Wasylina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009
  4. Anthony Wasylina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  5. Anthony Wasylina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API