Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 10, 1989No. 05-86-00541-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant appeals a conviction for arson. The jury assessed punishment at fifteen years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirmed. Taylor v. State, 735 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987) (Taylor I). In affirming we held that the parole law instruction mandated by article 37.07, section 4, of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure was constitutional. In doing so, we erred. Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). Consequently, the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded this cause to this court so that we may…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. LaPoint v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Wheeler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Kathleen E. Eckholm v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  5. Samuel Ledesma v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API