Legal Opinion

Almanza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1985No. 242-83PublishedCited by 5,803 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TEAGUE, Judge.

The Fort Worth Court of Appeals stated the following in Almanza v. State, 645 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.App. — Ft. Worth 1983):

Although many recent opinions have offhandedly dismissed the changing of ‘and’ in the indictment to ‘or’ in the court’s charge, such approach is dangerous and usually fatal in matters where aggravation or jurisdiction is involved. In the instant cause of aggravated rape the indictment joined the allegation of threats of death to the standard form allegation of rape by the word and. In the court’s charge,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Messenger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by5,803 opinions

  1. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

5,798 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API