Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1957No. 37081PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORN, Vice Chief Justice.

This appeal, for the second time, presents for consideration plaintiffs’ claim for damages alleged to have resulted from defendants’ construction of the Turner Turnpike. The factual matters are delineated in Chandler v. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, Okl., 271 P.2d 374. However, the following recitation will aid in consideration of the questions presented herein.

For many years plaintiffs owned and occupied a farm one mile east of Wellston, Oklahoma, their home and improvements being located on the southeast 40 acres. At all times prior to construction of the Turnpike a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Deardorf v. RosenbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. City of Chickasha v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API