Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hosking

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1933No. 7,176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendants have appealed from a judgment declaring subdivision 3 of section 2 of Chapter 46, Laws of 1933, and all of that Act to the extent that its provisions attempt to carry out and make effective the provisions of subdivision 3, unconstitutional and void, and enjoining the state officials charged with carrying out the provisions of the Act from acting under the provisions of subdivision 3 of the Act.

Chapter 46, above, was enacted to “Regulate the Practice of the Profession of Public Accounting, ” as a substitute for Chapter 231, Revised Codes of 1921. It authorizes the State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Marshall v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Frazer v. SheltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. In Re Application of HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leuthold v. BrandjordMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Debién v. Junta de ContabilidadSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  3. State ex rel. Morgan v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. BaysMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Debién v. Board of AccountancySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API