Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1908No. 3795PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for violating the Act of the Thirtieth Legislature regulating the practice of barbering, the registering and licensing of persons to carry on such practice, etc.

The facts show that on the 21st of October last appellant was following and had been pursuing his trade or occupation as a barber for about six years, and by this means earned support for himself by cutting the hair and shaving the beard of those who patronized his shop, and on the particular date in question he had cut the hair of S. D. Williams, as well as shaved him, for which he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HirnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  2. City of New Orleans v. BayleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. City of New Orleans v. Lagman & SonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  4. State v. DielenschneiderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  5. Mullinnix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gerard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Ex Parte Johnny GeorgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Hanzal v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Russell Flour & Feed Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Hurt v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API