Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Marshall v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1915No. 3,608PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Original application for a writ of prohibition by the State, on the relation of Lncy A. Marshall, M. M. Hughes and others, as the Montana State Board of Examiners for Nurses, against the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District in and for the County of Yellowstone, and George W. Pierson, a Judge thereof.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanner

Original application on the relation of Lucy A, Marshall and four other persons, constituting the Montana State Board of Examiners for Nurses, for a writ absolute to prohibit the district court of Yellowstone county and the Hon. George W. Pierson, one of the judges thereof, from taking any further steps in a certain mandamus proceeding now pending before said court. The material facts are as follows: On January 2, 1914, one Ellen M. Woolsey filed with the relators her application for examination and registration under the provisions of Chapter 50, Session Laws of 1913. She was then over the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cunningham v. Northwestern Improvement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. McCaffery v. AloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Thibodeau v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Lane v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Examining & Trial Board v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API