Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Humphrey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1929No. 27,589PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

George W. Humphrey made an application under L. 1929, p. 630, c. 424, to be admitted to practice as an attorney at law. The state bar association filed objections to his admission on the ground that he had not passed the examination required by the board of law examiners and the rules of this court. The objectors concede that he has brought himself within the provisions of the statute cited, but contend that the statute violates the following provisions of the constitution: Art. 1, § 2, which reads in part:

“No member of this state shall be * * * deprived of any of the rights or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Allen v. Pioneer-Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Johnson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Murray v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Barr v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. State v. BrodenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Roberts v. HoskingMontana Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API