Legal Opinion

Yates v. Goodwin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 30, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On report. Assumpsit on a promissory note set out in the opinion, which states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Savage, ,1.

Action against the defendant as indorser of the following note.

“$1500. Biddeford, March 16, 1894.

On demand for value received, the Ensor Kemedy Company of Biddeford promises to pay to its own order the sum of fifteen hundred dollars with interest at the rate of four per cent per annum. '

The Ensor Kemedy Co.

By C. E. Goodwin,

Treas. ”

The Ensor Kemedy Company indorsed and negotiated this note to Luther Bryant, upon or after its date. Before negotiation, the defendant and others put their names upon the back under the name of the original maker and indorser. It is settled law, and is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merritt v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Lockwood v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
  3. Parker v. . StroudNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Cate v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re B. & R. Glove Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. SpiroMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Baxter T. BeckwithColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Murray v. Third Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. O'Connell v. FitzpatrickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API