Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

The Chicago Bank of Commerce, the indorsee of a collateral judgment note for $1,000 dated October 2, 1930, due “On Demand” made by defendant, payable to the Old Dearborn State Bank, caused judgment by confession to be entered on the note against defendant. Afterward the judgment was opened up and defendant given leave to plead. The case was put at issue and on the trial the receiver of plaintiff was substituted as plaintiff. The court found in defendant’s favor and plaintiff appeals.

The record discloses that defendant has been practicing his profession as a physician and surgeon in Chicago…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Due v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Murray v. Third Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. Yates v. GoodwinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  4. Davis National Bank of Piedmont v. KightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gossett v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API