Legal Opinion

Merritt v. . Todd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1861PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There is a most inconvenient uncertainty as to the rule of law applicable to the question in this case — an uncertainty, not inherent in the subject, but which arises from the want of harmony, and still more, I think, from the want of an intelligible principle in many of the adjudged cases. The difficulty is not inherent, because there are two opposing principles, either of which would furnish a rule sufficiently clear and precise for the determination of this and all similar controversies; but the greater number of decided cases, while following neither one of those theories, do not suggest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Field v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. Furman v. HaskinNew York Supreme Court · 1805
  3. Martin v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1821
  4. Sice v. CunninghamNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  5. Vreeland v. HydeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Payne v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Strong v. . SheffieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Wheeler v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Herrick v. . WoolvertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Pardee v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API