Merritt v. . Todd
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
There is a most inconvenient uncertainty as to the rule of law applicable to the question in this case — an uncertainty, not inherent in the subject, but which arises from the want of harmony, and still more, I think, from the want of an intelligible principle in many of the adjudged cases. The difficulty is not inherent, because there are two opposing principles, either of which would furnish a rule sufficiently clear and precise for the determination of this and all similar controversies; but the greater number of decided cases, while following neither one of those theories, do not suggest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Field v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Furman v. HaskinNew York Supreme Court · 1805
- Martin v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1821
- Sice v. CunninghamNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Vreeland v. HydeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829
3Cited by39 opinions
- Payne v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Strong v. . SheffieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Wheeler v. . WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Herrick v. . WoolvertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Pardee v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.