Legal Opinion

Cate v. Patterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1872PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Oakland Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy, Ch. J.

Defendant in errror brought his action in the court below against plaintiff in error as endorser of the certificate of deposit of which the following is a copy:

“No. 6416. D. L. Latourette, successor of the First National Bank of Fenton, Michigan.
“Fenton, July 18,1871.
“ H. C. Riggs, Esq., has deposited iu this bank five hundred and fifty dollars, payable to the order of Rufus Cate, with interest if left three months, on the return of this certificate.
“D. L. Latourette, Cashier.”

This certificate was indorsed by Cate, to whose order it *193was payable. The declaration was upon the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curran v. WitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Wolfe v. A. E. Kusterer & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Tripp v. CurteniusMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Farmers Bank v. Johnson, King & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API