Legal Opinion

Huhtala v. Travelers Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1977No. 57817, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiff Bonnie Cummings was injured in an automobile accident. The owner of the automobile in which Cummings was riding as a passenger was insured by defendant Travelers Insurance Company. Three years, two and one-half months after the accident, Cummings and her father, Arne Huhtala, commenced this action against Travelers and George Lynott, a Travelers claims manager, asserting that the defendants had promised the plaintiffs that a full and equitable settlement would be paid after Cummings’ physical condition stabilized.

The defendants moved for accelerated judgment on the ground that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. State Mutual Cyclone Insurance v. O & a Electric CooperativeMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Parish v. B F Goodrich Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Weeks v. Slavik Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hill v. Sears, Roebuck and CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Schoff v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Khalaf v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1978

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API