Legal Opinion

Renackowsky v. Board of Water Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1900PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to Wayne; Wisner, J., presiding. Case by August Renackowsky against the board of water commissioners of the city of Detroit for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on demurrer to the declaration, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries sustained by reason of the negligent act of defendant in the year 1893. The suit'was instituted in December, 189?. To a declaration setting up the facts the defendant interposed a demurrer, setting up a statute of limitations as to such^afitions, enacted in 1895, and in effect September 1, 1895 (Act No. 463, Local Acts 1895). By stipulation, the plaintiff amended his declaration, setting up, as reasons why the statute of limitations had not run, the following facts:

“1. That the said defendant recognized the fact that the plaintiff had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Voorheis v. People's Mutual Benefit SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City of Detroit v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Dean v. CrallMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Springer v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Huhtala v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API