Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 4, 1988No. 5759PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding the plaintiff in contempt as a result of her violation of certain terms of the parties’ dissolution decree. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in finding that a promissory note was not due and payable as a result of the plaintiff’s rental of the marital home, despite the fact that such rental violated the terms of the dissolution decree, and (2) in denying the defendant’s motion for modification of alimony in light of the plaintiff’s receipt of substantial income from the rental of the marital home. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Castro v. CastroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API