Legal Opinion
Reed v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1947No. Civ. 3633; Civ. 3634PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
These are actions for damages arising out of an automobile collision. After trial by a jury, judgments were entered against the defendant city, awarding the plaintiff Reed $37,500, and the plaintiff Croft $2,000. From these judgments the city has appealed. The cases were consolidated for the trial and on this appeal.
The accident occurred near midnight on July 18, 1943, on Rose Canyon Highway, which is a part of Highway 101 as it enters San Diego from the north. This is a divided highway with a concrete barrier in the center, leaving 23 feet on each side for northbound and southbound traffic,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Lucas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Raynor v. City of ArcataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Newman v. SteuernagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hopping v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Kaisner v. KolbSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Lugtu v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Duarte v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Cavagnaro v. City of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.