Legal Opinion
Newman v. Steuernagel
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1933No. Docket No. 1206PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries, which arose under the following circumstances. The defendant Cypress Petroleum Company was operating an oil lease in Kern County, some miles from the city of Taft. The defendant Steuernagel was employed by this company as its foreman upon said lease, it being understood that he should use his own automobile when he needed a ear for company service. On April 14, 1930, the defendant Andreola, who was not employed by the oil company, was visiting Steuernagel at the lease. Steuernagel decided to go to Taft to order a part for a Ford tractor in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Katz v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Bush v. Weed Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Kirk v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Midland Counties Public Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Tate v. CanonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Gibson v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cook v. SeidenvergWashington Supreme Court · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.