Legal Opinion

Moscahlades Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 3, 1915No. 1549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 47286.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The sole issue proffered by this appeal presents the inquiry, When is fish roe “ preserved ” within the provisions of paragraph 216 of the tariff act of 1913, levying duty upon “ caviar and other preserved roe of fish”? The appellants, importers, maintain the importation, which was of fish roe, entitled to free entry under paragraph 478 of that act as “ eggs of * * * fish.” The board overruled the protests, remarking:

The importers’ counsel points out in his brief that the issue here is the same as that suggested by the Court of Customs Appeals in United States v. Adams Express Co. (2 Ct.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Kagawa & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Edenfruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. Green Giant Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API