United States v. Kagawa & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7507 (T. D. 33911).
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
Tbe merchandise in this case was imported from Japan under tbe tariff act of 1909. It is called “Kazunoko” and consists of tbe roe of tbe herring in a dried condition.
*389The collector classified the article as preserved fish roe, dutiable as such under paragraph 270 of the act, and accordingly assessed the same with duty at the rate of 30 per cent ad valorem.
The importers protested against the assessment, claiming free entry for the merchandise as fish eggs under paragraph 560 of the act.
The protest was submitted to the Board of General Appraisers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Menzel & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Quong Lee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Protest 46147-K of Enbun Co.United States Customs Court · 1945
- F. F. G. Harper & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.