Legal Opinion

United States v. American Express Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 22, 1911No. 566PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7152 (T. D. 31205).

1Opinion of the Court

De Vries, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The merchandise is caviar imported in tins. It was assessed for dutiable purposes at 30 per cent, ad valorem under the appropriate provision of paragraph 270 of the tariff act of 1909, which reads:

270. * * * Caviar, and other preserved roe of fish, thirty per centum ad valorem.

*96The allegations of the importer, appellee here, is that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under paragraph 560 of the act, which provides:

560. Eggs of birds, fish, and insects (except fish roe preserved for food purposes): * * *

The board sustained the protest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Kagawa & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Houlder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API