Legal Opinion
Ray v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided September 13, 2013No. 4:11-cv-334PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge.
Before the Court is Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Defendant” or “UP”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”), filed June 10, 2013. Clerk’s No. 21. Thomas W. Ray (“Plaintiff’ or “Ray”) filed a resistance to the Motion on July 12, 2013. Clerk’s No. 26. Defendant replied on July 22, 2013. Clerk’s No. 27. The matter is fully submitted.1
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff began working for Defendant on June 17, 1996. Def.’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Supp. of Its Mot. For Summ. J. (“Def.’s Facts”) (Clerk’s No. 21.2) ¶ 1. At the time of Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Curtis Rookaird v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Kelly Heim v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Daniel Lemon v. Norfolk So. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Justin Reed v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Armstrong v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.