Justin Reed v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This case is about the meaning of the election-of-remedies provision in the Federal Railroad Safety Act (“FRSA”). The defendant, Norfolk Southern Railway, claims that this provision bars a railroad employee who has been wrongfully discharged from obtaining relief through both grievance-arbitration pursuant to the Railway Labor Act and an administrative claim or lawsuit under FRSA. We disagree. Although our reasoning differs from the district court’s, we too conclude that nothing in FRSA bars an employee from bringing both claims.
I. Background
In April 2009, Justin Reed, a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Danny Grimes v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Armstrong v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Abdelaal v. Wsp Global IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Christopher Peterson v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.