Legal Opinion

CTC Real Estate Services v. Lepe

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2006No. B185320PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We hold that the victim of an identity theft, whose name and other personal information were used without authorization for the purpose of obtaining a loan secured by a purchase money deed of trust to acquire real property, may, as the only claimant, recover undistributed surplus proceeds deposited with the court that remained after a trustee sale of the property and the satisfaction of creditors.

BACKGROUND

An unknown perpetrator used the name, other personal information, and credit of claimant (defendant and appellant) Aurora Lepe to purchase real property—an act of “identity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Yeap v. LeakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. HagedornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Perrin Davis v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. J.R. Marketing, L.L.C.California Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Erhart v. Bofi Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  5. Rodriguez v. Bank of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API