Legal Opinion

People v. Hagedorn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 2005No. F044370PublishedCited by 31 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, P. J.

On July 1, 2002, appellant David John Hagedorn entered a Money Mart in Ridgecrest and used a copy of Arthur Pettet’s Social Security card and birth certificate, without Pettet’s permission, in an attempt to cash a check. Although made payable to Pettet, the check constituted payment for work performed by appellant under Pettet’s name. As a result, a jury convicted appellant of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, 1 § 460, subd. (b); count 1) and unauthorized use of personal identifying information (§ 530.5; count 2), and he was sentenced to three years in prison and ordered…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Tijani v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. Vo Nghia SyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. BarbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API