Legal Opinion
Erhart v. Bofi Holding, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 30, 2019No. Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BOFI HOLDING, INC.'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (ECF No. 78); AND(2) DENYING CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (ECF No. 96)
Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF Nos. 78, 96.) The Court finds these motions suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b) ; Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART BofI…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Albert's Organics, Inc. v. HolzmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Elevation Point 2 Inc. v. GukasyanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Howell v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.