Legal Opinion

People v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1924No. Crim. No. 1087PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant and one Talbott were charged jointly with the crime of embezzlement. From a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant Kelly appeals to this court.

The first point made by counsel is that the deputy district attorney in charge of the prosecution of the case on trial was guilty of gross misconduct while addressing the jury, and which misconduct resulted in prejudicially affecting defendant’s rights—the first specification of error in that regard being that, although defendant Kelly had not been called as a witness on the trial of the action, nor…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. VollmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API