Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1913No. Crim. No. 448PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The defendant in this case, having been convicted in the court below of the crime of felony embezzlement, prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Minus minor matters, the facts of the case upon which the prosecution relied for a conviction are substantially these:

The defendant at the time of the commisssion of the crime charged in the information was engaged in the real estate business in the city of Oakland, and had been employed by the complaining witness, Antonio Marciel, to negotiate the purchase of a piece of real property situate in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. MoraniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. Ho Kim YouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. People v. HickokCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API