Legal Opinion

People v. Lawlor

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1913No. Crim. No. 423PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of final conviction and from an order denying a new trial in a case wherein the defendant was charged with the crime of pandering as defined by a recent enactment of the legislature (Stats. 1911, p. 9), one clause of which provides that “Any person who shall procure for a female person a place as inmate in a house of prostitution or as inmate of any place in which prostitution is encouraged or allowed within this state . . . shall be guilty of a felony, to wit, pandering. ...”

This clause of the statute constituted the charging part of the information upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People v. ShearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. LeyshonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API