Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Ackerman v. City of Carlsbad
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1935No. 4097PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Justice.
This litigation concerns an issue of bonds by the city of Carlsbad in the sum of $500 each, and aggregating $366,000. They all bear date July 1, 1929. Except for the reserved option of the city “to redeem this bond at any time before maturity, by paying therefor its par value and accrued interest,” they all mature July 1, 1940. Annual interest at 6 per cent, payable January 1st and July 1st of each year is provided for, and is represented by 22 coupons attached to each bond.
These are not general obligation bonds. Each recites that it was issued in exchange for “a like amount”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barnett v. DenisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Haverty v. International Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. District Court of McKinley CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Altman v. KilburnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Santa Fe v. First Nat. Bank in RatonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Crist v. Town of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.