State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage District
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
By this mandamus proceeding, which originated in the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County in April, 1932, the relator bank seeks to compel the respondent drainage district through its officers to pay six of its matured drainage bonds, and ninety-three interest coupons from’ these and other like bonds. The aggregate amount due thereon at the institution of the action was $8516.15. The due date of two of the coupons, calling for $27.50, was October 1, 1929. All the rest of the coupons and all of the bonds were of later maturity. .
The bonds and coupons, are owned and held by the relator…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Norris v. Montezuma Valley Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Jewell v. City of SuperiorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- McGhee v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Ackerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Groner v. United States Ex Rel. SnowerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Ross v. General American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.