Legal Opinion

Haverty v. International Stevedoring Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1925No. 19044. Department OnePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover for personal injuries, and from a verdict in his favor for $3,500 and a judgment thereon, the defendant has appealed.

By his original complaint, the respondent alleged that, on May 31, 1923, he was employed as a stevedore by the appellant, and engaged in loading wool in the hold of the steamship Andrea Luckenbach, in Seattle harbor; and while so engaged was injured through the negligence of the winchman, who carelessly and without warning lowered a load of wool into the hold, striking the respondent, who was then engaged in stowing away…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Pacific American Fisheries v. HoofCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  4. Bowes v. BaumertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. Alaska Pacific S. S. Co. v. EganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gnash v. SaariWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Larson v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Ackerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API