Legal Opinion
Digital Equipment Corporation v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 25, 1990No. 89-1438PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.
DECISION
The United States appeals from a decision of the United States Court of International Trade which found that the Customs Service had improperly classified merchandise as “rectifiers and rectifying apparatus” under Item 682.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Digital Equip. Corp. v. United States, 710 F.Supp. 1381 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1988). We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
The subject imported merchandise, which can generally be described as power supplies for computers, has been stipulated for the purpose of this action to be represented by the DEC…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Hasbro Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Flex Track Equipment Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Ugg International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Avenues in Leather, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.