Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Judge.
Pursuant to USCIT Rule 59, plaintiff Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. (“TKS”) moves this Court to reconsider its decision in Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United States, 24 CIT-, 97 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2000) (“Mitsubishi III”), affirming the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) second remand determination in connection with its antidumping duty determination in Large Newspaper Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or Unassembled, From Japan, 61 Fed.Reg. 38,139 (Dep’t Commerce, July 23, 1996) (final determ) (“Japan Final”),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Sharp Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, and Goss Graphics Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Save Domestic Oil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Chemetals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Dixon Ticonderoga Co. v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005