Legal Opinion

Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 1, 2005No. 93-648XPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INTERIM REPORT REGARDING S. 794 “A BILL FOR THE RELIEF OF LAND GRANTORS IN HENDERSON, UNION, AND WEBSTER COUNTIES, KENTUCKY, AND THEIR HEIRS” AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRADEN, Judge.

Shortly after the onset of World War II, the United States (“Government”) acquired approximately 35,849.28 acres of land in the counties of Henderson, Union, and Webster, Kentucky to establish an Army training facility, that later was named Camp Breckinridge. Almost all of this property was owned by farmers who resided on this land, which had been in the same families for generations and, more importantly, on which…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Land Grantors in Henderson, Union & Webster Counties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Boston Harbor Development Partners, LLC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API