Miller v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS I THROUGH VIII
BARTLETT, District Judge.
Defendant Wackenhut Services, Inc. moves to dismiss Counts I through VIII of the Second Amended Petition for Damages pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs Mashel and Donald Miller’s Petition contains 14 counts: six counts based upon Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.), six counts based upon Missouri employment discrimination statutes…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sundaram v. Brookhaven National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Kelly v. Lockheed Martin Services GroupDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998
- Callanan v. RunyunDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Lockhart v. MVM, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Osburn v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.