Legal Opinion
Callanan v. Runyun
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 24, 1994No. Civ. 3-92-807PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Erickson’s Order and Report and Recommendation. The Order, from which no appeal has been taken, grants Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Request for a Jury Trial and for Compensatory Damages. The R and R recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted with respect to Plaintiffs hostile environment and retaliation claims and denied with respect to Plaintiffs disparate treatment claims. Defendant has filed timely objections to the R and R “to the limited extent that it does not recommend dismissal of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Marjorie A. Meester v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Reidy v. RunyonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Gibson v. HendersonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
- Noble v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.