Legal Opinion
Esposito v. Schiff
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 15, 1995No. 13408PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff appeals in this medical malpractice action from the judgment for the defendant, Martin Schiff, Jr.,1 after a jury trial. The plaintiff claims that the trial court was incorrect in precluding the jury from considering the allegation of negligence that the defendant failed to inform the plaintiff that he did not remove all of the kidney stones. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts pertinent to this appeal that are not disputed are as follows. On July 8, 1986, the defendant, a surgeon, operated on the plaintiff and removed three kidney stones and left five kidney…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Slimak v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Law v. CampDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Alexander v. Town of VernonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Weaver v. McKnightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Yarasavich v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2010
- Bowerman v. United Illuminating, No. X04-Cv-94-0115436-S (Dec. 15, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.