Legal Opinion
Weaver v. McKnight
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 10, 2012No. AC 31969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The facts underlying this case involve one of life’s most heartrending and painful *654events, the stillbirth of an infant. After suffering this terrible loss, the plaintiffs, Dorothy Weaver and Fred Weaver, as coadministrators of the estate of Demarius Douglas Weaver (decedent), and Dorothy Weaver, individually, filed a medical malpractice action against the defendants Henry Amdur, a physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, and Thames Gynecologic Group, P.C.1 The dispositive issue is whether the trial court properly precluded two of the plaintiffs’ expert…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Grody v. TulinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sargis v. DonahueConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Weaver v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Weaver v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Weaver v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014