Legal Opinion

Slimak v. Foster

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1927PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The plaintiff offered evidence from which the jury might reasonably have found that while the defendant, a physician and surgeon specializing in the treatment of diseases of the eye, ear, nose and throat, was performing an operation upon the plaintiff for the removal of a bony spur from the left nostril of his nose, a blade of the instrument which he was using broke off in the cartilage of the nose and remained lodged therein. The defendant did not remove this broken piece or inform the plaintiff of its presence, but gave him treatment two or three times thereafter; neither did he complete…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Davis v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API