In Re Initiative Petition No. 314
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
This matter comes before us on a timely protest to the validity of Initiative Petition No. 314, State Question No. 550, and objections to the count of signatures subscribed thereto. Such proceedings are authorized by 34 O.S.Supp.1979, § 8.
This action was ordered bifurcated and the evidentiary hearing on the protest to signatures was referred to a Referee of the Supreme Court. The legal issues raised by contestants directed at the sufficiency and validity of the petition itself were retained by the Court. Briefing time on pure legal issues was accelerated, and the Court heard…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 344, State Question No. 630Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.