Legal Opinion
In Re the Quantification of Environmental Costs
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1998No. CX-97-1391PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The Minnesota Legislature directed the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (the commission) to determine environmental cost values for each method of electricity generation and required utilities to use those values in proceedings before the commission. The commission set interim environmental cost values for five air pollutants on March 1, 1994, including carbon dioxide (C02). The commission also initiated a contested case proceeding to set final environmental cost values and appointed an administrative law judge (ALJ) to preside over the proceedings. On January 3,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Soo Line Railroad v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001