Legal Opinion
Max Schwartzman & Sons v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 28, 2003No. C4-03-389, A03-224PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, relators Schwartzman Company, Inc., Max Schwartzman & Sons, Inc., and Jon Schwartzman challenge the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) January 28, 2003 administrative order and its denial of relators’ request for a contested-case hearing. Relators argue that (1) the MPCA’s order requiring relators within six months to remove an earthen berm constructed -with shredder fluff on their property is not supported by substantial evidence and (2) the MPCA erred in holding that the use of the shredder fluff in the berm constitutes disposal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Occupational License of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- County of Milwaukee v. Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Minneapolis Police Department v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re BuckmasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Enlargement of the Valley Branch Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.