Legal Opinion

In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 2000No. C5-99-1383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

After recovering $469 million as part of the 1998 settlement of Minnesota tobacco litigation, relator Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota found itself with a quantity of surplus prohibited by law for a nonprofit health service plan corporation. These are administrative proceedings in which ■ the respondent Commissioner of Commerce has explored the question of whether to approve the plan that Blue Cross developed to adjust its operations so that its surplus condition would be corrected.

Striking or altering more than 50 of the 200 findings of fact of an administrative…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silva v. Ada TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API